With few exceptions, energy-efficiency metrics for HVAC equipment are based on electrical-power input versus desired output. One glaring exception concerns fans. Most fan manufacturers provide only shaft input power and impeller speed. Of course, the electrical power needed to drive a fan (A) depends on the individual efficiencies of the rest of the system: transmission (B), motor (C) and variable-speed drive (D) (Figure 1). Electrical-power input is calculated by multiplying shaft input power by each of the efficiencies:

P = H_i x η_b x η_m x η_c x 0.7457         (IP)

P = H_i x η_b x η_m x η_c                          (SI)

where:

P = Electrical-power input (kW)

H_i = Fan-shaft input power (HP for IP, kW for SI)

η_b = transmission efficiency (%)

η_m = motor efficiency (%)

η_c = speed-controller efficiency (%)

0.7457 = conversion of horsepower to kilowatts

FIGURE 1: Components of a conventional fan system

Historically, a significant problem for fan-system engineers was the lack of a standard method for calculating individual component efficiencies, which made reliable comparisons of systems nearly impossible (Figure 2). The dilemma was exacerbated by the growing popularity of integrated electronically commutated fan/motor/controller packages, for which a manufacturer can certify only electrical input power, forcing designers to try to compare apples and oranges.

Recognising this problem, Air Movement and Control Association (AMCA) International developed ANSI/AMCA Standard 207, Fan System Efficiency and Fan System Input Power Calculation. ANSI/AMCA Standard 207 provides tools enabling reliable comparisons of the electrical-power input of different fan-system configurations at varying loads, including motor service factor.

ANSI/AMCA Standard 207 covers most conventional fan systems, starting with the familiar fan total or static efficiency and fan-shaft input power, based on fan airflow performance, tested in accordance with:

• ANSI/AMCA Standard 210, Laboratory Methods of Testing Fans for Certified Aerodynamic Performance Rating;
• ANSI/AMCA Standard 230, Laboratory Methods of Testing Air Circulating Fans for Rating and Certification;
• ANSI/AMCA Standard 260, Laboratory Methods of Testing Induced Flow Fans for Rating;

[or]

• ISO 5801, Industrial Fans – Performance Testing Using Standardized Airways, and rated in accordance with AMCA Publication 211, Certified Ratings Program Product Rating Manual for Fan Air Performance

Transmission-efficiency equations are provided for V-belts, synchronous belts and flexible couplings. Direct-drive connections are considered to be 100% efficient. ANSI/AMCA Standard 207 assumes belts and pulleys are properly aligned and tensioned.

Motor-efficiency calculations apply only to three-phase induction motors within the scope of the Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA) in North America – that is, three-phase NEMA MG 1 Premium Efficiency general-purpose motors – and motors regulated under European and Chinese standards. This includes open-drip-proof and totally enclosed, fan-cooled (TEFC) motors from 1 to 500 HP. Other types of motors are explicitly excluded. Single-phase, 575-V and permanent-magnet motors are out of scope.

Speed controllers must be typical pulse-width-modulated variable-frequency drives (VFDs), programmed to maintain a fixed ratio of voltage to frequency at or below synchronous speed. VFDs programmed for constant torque control operate in a very different manner. Other characteristics defining VFD efficiency, such as carrier frequency and lead length, are assumed to be within typical operating parameters. Of course, if a system does not have a VFD, speed-controller efficiency is not part of the equation.

One of the greatest benefits of ANSI/AMCA Standard 207 is that much of what was previously “known” about part-load motor-system efficiency has been debunked. Consider:

Myth: VFD losses are 100% parasitic and constant over a motor’s output-power range, leading to huge inefficiencies at low load

Fact: The efficiency curve of a motor operating in conjunction with a VFD with a constant ratio of voltage to frequency is very different than that of the same motor operating direct on line (DOL) at a constant 50 Hz or 60 Hz.

Varying voltage with frequency maintains a constant flux and, therefore, a very flat efficiency curve for the motor itself. Further, VFD losses do not remain constant as load decreases.

Figure 3 shows that the difference in efficiency between a motor operating DOL and one operating in conjunction with a VFD is relatively constant over the range of motor output power.

Myth: An oversized motor yields much lower efficiencies when the system operates at part load.

Fact: Concerns about part-load efficiency are valid when a motor is operated DOL. Surprisingly, though, when motors of different sizes are operated with a VFD, their efficiencies and power consumption are nearly identical.

Table 1 shows the power consumption of motor/VFD combinations of different sizes with a fan-shaft power of 7 HP (5.2 kW) at the air-system design condition. The difference in electricity consumption is slight. In fact, it is shown in table form, because a graph of the data looks almost like a single line.

TABLE 1: VFD power consumption with four-pole, EISA-compliant TEFC motors of different sizes, each with a 7 HP (3.2 kW) design load

Designers would benefit through requesting AMCA 207 calculations from manufacturers

Until now, designers have had no easy way to compare the electricity consumption of different fan systems and, instead, have been reliant on general assumptions that do not always hold true. For example, contrary to popular belief, a high-efficiency, permanent-magnet motor does not guarantee lower power consumption. In the vast majority of fan systems, fan-impeller efficiency overshadows differences in motor/drive efficiency. In a typical system, the impeller accounts for 75% or more of wire-to-air power losses. A super-high-efficiency motor/drive system gains a few points of wire-to-shaft efficiency over a conventional system, but if its impeller is even only slightly less efficient at the intended duty, then all of the gains will be lost.

Designers should ask manufacturers for electrical-input-power calculations, as per ANSI/AMCA Standard 207 for fans with induction motors. This will allow a straightforward duty-point-specific comparison with fan packages that are rated based on electrical-input-power measurements.

Adoption of AMCA 207

ANSI/AMCA Standard 207 will rapidly become part of everyday life in the fan world. It will be used by fan manufacturers to calculate fan energy index (FEI) (read Meet the new Fan Energy Index, https://www.hpac.com/industry-perspectives/meet-new-fan-energy-index). Not only will use of FEI be required starting with the 2019 version of ANSI/ASHRAE/IES 90.1, Energy Standard for Buildings Except Low-Rise Residential Buildings, the California Energy Commission has proposed a requirement that all fans sold in California meet minimum FEI requirements. Additionally, the Air-Conditioning, Heating, and Refrigeration Institute (AHRI) is in the process of changing AHRI Standard 430, Performance Rating of Central Station Air-handling Unit Supply Fans, to require the reporting of electrical power input instead of shaft power input, with an option to provide a calculation, as per ANSI/AMCA Standard 207.

John Bade is an energy-efficiency consultant. Armin Hauer is Manager, Regulatory and Government Affairs, ebm-papst Inc.